CREDIT GOES TO themankindillusion @ INSTAGRAM
LETS START WITH CENSORSHIP FROM COVID 19 OPPOSITION 😮
FORMER CBC REPORTER CONFIRMS THEY PROMOTED COVID PROPAGANDA
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Propaganda often involves biased or misleading information used to promote a particular political cause or point of view.
It can include exaggerations, half-truths, or even outright lies to influence public opinion. The goal is to manipulate people’s beliefs, attitudes, or actions to achieve a specific agenda.
CREDIT GOES TO corruptionreport @ INSTAGRAM
MARK ZUCKERBURG CENSORED COVID 19 CONTENT 😮
Yes, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has claimed that the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor certain COVID-19 content during the pandemic. In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg stated that senior officials from the White House repeatedly pressured Facebook to take down specific content, including humor and satire, related to COVID-19.
The White House, in response, has maintained that their actions were aimed at encouraging responsible behavior to protect public health and safety.
ROWAN ATKINSON DISCUSSING THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
Censorship can indeed be seen as a violation of free speech, especially when it involves government actions that restrict or suppress expression based on its content or viewpoint. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right to free speech, meaning the government cannot regulate or restrict speech simply because it disagrees with the message.
However, the issue is complex. There are certain types of speech, such as defamation, incitement to violence, and obscenity, that are not protected under the First Amendment. Additionally, private companies and organizations are not bound by the First Amendment in the same way the government is, so they can impose their own rules and restrictions on speech.
In essence, while censorship by the government is generally seen as a violation of free speech, there are nuances and exceptions that make the topic more intricate.
додому
Про нас
Service
Події
Participate
Форум
New Page
Інформаційний центр
контакт
More...
CREDIT GOES TO themankindillusion @ INSTAGRAM
FORMER CBC REPORTER CONFIRMS THEY PROMOTED COVID PROPAGANDA
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Propaganda often involves biased or misleading information used to promote a particular political cause or point of view.
It can include exaggerations, half-truths, or even outright lies to influence public opinion. The goal is to manipulate people’s beliefs, attitudes, or actions to achieve a specific agenda.
CREDIT GOES TO corruptionreport @ INSTAGRAM
MARK ZUCKERBURG CENSORED COVID 19 CONTENT 😮
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Yes, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has claimed that the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor certain COVID-19 content during the pandemic. In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg stated that senior officials from the White House repeatedly pressured Facebook to take down specific content, including humor and satire, related to COVID-19.
The White House, in response, has maintained that their actions were aimed at encouraging responsible behavior to protect public health and safety.
CREDIT GOES TO themankindillusion @ INSTAGRAM
ROWAN ATKINSON DISCUSSING THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Censorship can indeed be seen as a violation of free speech, especially when it involves government actions that restrict or suppress expression based on its content or viewpoint. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right to free speech, meaning the government cannot regulate or restrict speech simply because it disagrees with the message.
However, the issue is complex. There are certain types of speech, such as defamation, incitement to violence, and obscenity, that are not protected under the First Amendment. Additionally, private companies and organizations are not bound by the First Amendment in the same way the government is, so they can impose their own rules and restrictions on speech.
In essence, while censorship by the government is generally seen as a violation of free speech, there are nuances and exceptions that make the topic more intricate.