THIS POST IS TO REVEAL THE SHORT COMINGS OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM
LET'S SEE HOW WIDESPREAD THE ISSUE IS
IT IS A BIG ENOUGH PROBLEM THAT THEY CREATED POLICE CAMS
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Certainly! Here are some lists of individuals who lost their lives due to police violence:
Mapping Police Violence Database (Since George Floyd’s Death):
At least 229 Black people have been killed by police officers across the U.S. since George Floyd’s murder in May 2020.
The victims range in age from three months to 88 years old. However, this figure is likely an underestimate due to incomplete reporting.
NPR’s Curated List (Since Eric Garner’s Death in 2014):
Harvard Project (2000 to May 2020):
A comprehensive project gathered stories of those killed in police-related violence. The list contains 28,000 names of individuals killed from January 2000 until May 2020.
2022 Police Violence Report:
This report provides an analysis of deadly police violence in 2022. It represents the most comprehensive public accounting of such incidents and highlights areas for improvement.
Remember that these lists represent only a portion of the lives lost, and efforts continue to address police violence and promote justice. 🌟
Here are some prominent cases of individuals who lost their lives due to police brutality over the past 20 years:
Eric Garner (2014): Died in New York City after a police officer placed him in a chokehold during an arrest for allegedly selling untaxed cigarettes.
Michael Brown (2014): Fatally shot by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, sparking protests and discussions about systemic issues.
Tamir Rice (2014): A 12-year-old boy shot dead by an officer in Cleveland, Ohio, while playing with a toy gun.
Walter Scott (2015): Shot in the back by a police officer in North Charleston, South Carolina, during a traffic stop.
CREDIT GOES TO kingkylelee @ INSTAGRAM
PUNCH TO THE FACE FOR NO REASON 😮
CREDIT GOES TO funnyvideosandtroll @ YOUTUBE
THEY WENT TO FAR AT THE SOCCER GAME AND THE WHOLE CROWD PROTECTED HIM
THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD ALL DO WHEN A COP BRUTALIZES SOMEONE
CREDIT GOES TO art8s @ YOUTUBE
MALCOM X WARNING YOU ABOUT POLICE BRUTALITY
CREDIT GOES TO plustvafrica @ YOUTUBE
EKITI STATE GOVERNMENT BEGINS COMPENSATION TO VICTIMS OF POLICE BRUTALITY
CREDIT GOES TO propublica @ YOUTUBE
POWERS VS FEMALE PEACEFUL PROTESTOR. OFFICE PROTECTED INSTEAD OF PROSECUTED
THEY MIGHT AS WELL JUST USE THE MILITARY AT THIS POINT
LOOK AT THE RIOT CONTROL VEHICLE IN THE BACK THAT USES MICROWAVE ENERGY 😮
ACCORDING TO COPILOT:
Riot control microwave energy technology, specifically the Active Denial System (ADS), is a non-lethal directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military. Here’s a detailed description:
Active Denial System (ADS)
Purpose and Development
Purpose: The ADS is designed for area denial, perimeter security, and crowd control. It aims to disperse crowds or control riots without causing permanent harm.
Development: Developed under the sponsorship of the Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program, with the Air Force Research Laboratory as the lead agency. It was first deployed in 2010 during the Afghanistan War but was withdrawn without seeing combat.
Mechanism of Action
Technology: The ADS works by emitting a high-powered beam of 95 GHz millimeter waves. These waves are similar to those used in microwave ovens but at a much higher frequency.
Effect on Targets: When directed at a person, the millimeter waves penetrate the skin’s surface, causing a rapid heating sensation. This effect is often described as feeling like the skin is burning, prompting individuals to move away from the beam. The sensation is intense but temporary and does not cause permanent damage under normal use conditions.
Operational Use
Deployment: The ADS is typically mounted on vehicles, but there are efforts to develop portable versions. It has been considered for use in various scenarios, including military operations and prison control.
Range and Control: The system can be used at relatively long ranges, potentially from low-flying aircraft or ground vehicles. The beam can be directed at specific individuals or scanned across a crowd.
Health and Safety
Penetration and Burns: The millimeter waves penetrate only the top layers of the skin, with most energy absorbed within 0.4 mm (1/64 inch). This minimizes the risk of deep tissue damage. However, prolonged exposure can cause first-degree burns and, in rare cases, second-degree burns.
Testing and Effects: Most human test subjects reach their pain threshold within 3 seconds, and none can endure more than 5 seconds. The system is designed to be non-lethal, with safety measures in place to prevent excessive exposure.
Controversy and Ethical Considerations
Public Reaction: The use of ADS has sparked debate and controversy, particularly regarding its potential use against civilians during protests. Concerns have been raised about the ethical implications and the potential for misuse.
International Development: Other countries, including Russia and China, are reportedly developing their own versions of the ADS.
The ADS represents a significant advancement in non-lethal crowd control technology, offering a means to manage riots and large gatherings without resorting to lethal force. However, its use must be carefully regulated to ensure ethical deployment and to prevent potential abuse.